The Vedas, the Sastras, and the messages of the Rishis, all
have proclaimed uniformly and without any possibility of doubt,
from that day to this, that Paramatma is Sarvaantharyaami, present
and immanent in everything. So too questions like the relationship
between 'He who is served', 'he who serves', and 'the wherewithal
of service', viz., 'Prakriti', have also been the subject of
endless discussion. Every Asthika has heard the Bhagavatha verse
in which the great Bhaktha Prahlada states out of his own
experience that Paramatma, the Sarvaantharyaami, need not be
searched far and wide and that He is very near the seeker himself.
'He is here, He is not there, give up such doubts;
Listen, Oh! Leader of the Danavas!
Wherever you seek and wherever you see,
There... and there... He is!'
People speak of the Lord as having a particular nature of
characteristic, as having a particular form and so on. These
statements are true only to the extent that imagination and
guesswork can approximate to Truth; they are not the fundamental
Truth. Such conceptions are valid as far as practical worldly
knowledge goes; they cannot be considered as valid knowledge of
the Absolute. For, it is impossible to see the Poornam or speak
about it.
In spite of this, however, Bhakthas and aspirants have been
framing, each according to the stage of his own inner progress,
some form or other of the Divine as the basis of their devotion.
They worship Paramathma as existing in some Ayodhya or Dwaraka and
nowhere else; as found in places where some image or picture
exists and nowhere else. They worship that form itself as Poornam.
Of course, it is not wrong to do so. Only, Bhakthas should not
proclaim that their belief alone is the Truth, that those names
and forms which they have ascribed are the only names and forms of
the Divine and that all other forms and names are worthless and
inferior. It should be realised that the names and forms which are
the ideals of others are as dear and sacred to those others as
other names and forms are to oneself.
When a form is idealised like this, it really becomes a symbol
of the Universal; but, how can a mere symbol of the Universal ever
become the Universal itself? Conscious always of this, every one
should acquire, without giving room to senseless hatred, the
vision that all forms of the ideal are equally valid and true.
Without this, it is impossible to realise the Poornam. All these
gross forms of the ideal are fully saturated with the subtle
Divine Principle. The taste of the vast ocean is to be found,
complete and undiminished, in every single drop of its waters;
but, this does not mean that the drop is the ocean. Though we
recognise the 'drop' and the 'ocean' as separate entities, the
nature and taste of both are identical. Similarly, the
sarvaantharyaami Paramaatma and the gross form and name which
Paramaatma assumes and through which He is realised are not
separate entities; they are identical.
When this All-pervasive, All-inclusive Pure existence is
described, the matter and the method depend on the principles of
the speaker and the tastes of the listener; when the individual
name and form imposed by the Bhaktha are transformed into the
Attributeless and the Formless, it is referred to as Brahmam; when
this same Brahmam appears with attributes and forms, it is
referred to as Rama, Krishna, Vishnu or Siva. Do not the followers
of even other religions agree that when the devotee attains the
Ecstasy of Mystic Union, all distinction between him and God
disappears? The Yogis, Philosophers of other lands and other
faiths, too, accept without demur that this distinctionless
experience can be earned through Parabhakthi. Even if some little
trace of difference is retained, it is due to the individuals own
taste and desire and not anything especially basic. It is only
when name and form come in that it is named differently as
Prakriti, Paramaatma and Bhaktha. When name and form are absent,
doubt and discussion whether it is masculine, feminine or neutral
will not arise at all. Then any description fits. For something
that is above and beyond imagination, any name and form can be
ascribed. In fact, It has no attribute and no form; it is
All-pervasive, Omnipresent. When this Subtle Omnipresence is
systematically worshipped through a gross form and as having
attributes, the devotee will clearly realise its nature through
the Sadhana itself. To vouchsafe the knowledge of this Sadhana and
that Truth, and to bless the Bhakthas with that Bliss, the
Attributeless Paramaatma incarnates in this world, assuming name
and form, and gives scope for all embodied beings to have concrete
experience and joy. Through these experiences, the Incarnations
facilitate the realisation that Paramaatma is Sarvaantharyaami and
Sarvabhoothaantharaatma, All-pervasive, the Inner Atma of every
thing in Creation. Lord Krishna showed in his own form the entire
Creation. Until he saw with his own eyes how Lord Krishna had
contained in His gross form of entire Creation, even Arjuna failed
to understand that Krishna was Sarvaantharyaami.
Love, Lover and the Loved, all those are One, and the same.
Without Love, there can be no lover. Even if there are both Love
and the Lover without the Loved, Love has no function. In all
three, Love is the chief ingredient. That which is saturated
chiefly, and uniformly in Everything, that is Paramaatma. So there
is no difference between these three. In all three, Prema is
discernible as the Sarvaantharyaami; therefore, can it not be
realised that everything is Paramaatmaswarupa? Certainly, it can
be realised without fail. Everything is suffused with Prema. So,
we can unhesitatingly declare the Paramaatma as Premaswarupa. In
the entire creation, for all living things, Prema is manifesting
itself in various forms. The nature of Prema cannot alter, though
it is known under different names like Vaatsalya, Anuraaga,
Bhakthi, Ishtam etc., according to the direction in which it is
canalised. But, whatever the form the essence cannot alter. On the
basis of this knowledge and experience, the conclusion becomes
clear that Paramaatma is Sarvabhoothaantharaatma, the inner Atma
of all created things.
That which teaches the highest knowledge of this Unity is known
as Adwaitha; that which teaches the principle of the Lover and the
Loved, the Jiva and the Brahmam is known as Dwaitha; that which
teaches about all three, Love, Lover and Loved, Prakriti, Jiva and
Brahmam, is known as Visishtadwaitha. But these three are one. The
child that is born changes into the student; the student changes
into the householder; but all three are one and the same person,
isn't it? While the manners and the attachments change in various
ways, he remains the same. From milk, butter and buttermilk
emerge. Milk, which contains all, is Adwaitha. Butter, which
contains the two categories, is Dwaitha; after that is separated,
the buttermilk which remains is Visishtadwaitha. But, though their
tastes differ the colour of all these is the same, always. This,
which is the same in all, is the Nirguna Brahmam.